Drawing for LA GRANDE CORNICHE

USPTO serial 87056137

LA GRANDE CORNICHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA GRANDE CORNICHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cushing O. Condon, Esquire

17 KEMP AVERUMSON, NJ 07760UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring gay culture, a restaurant and New York City in and around the 1980s provided through cable television and/or over-the-air television and/or webcastsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 17, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 16, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 2, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2016RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Sep 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance