USPTO serial 87056664
SONOMA BRANDS SB EST 2015
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SONOMA BRANDS SB EST 2015?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Noah Hagey
J. Noah Hagey BraunHagey & Borden LLP220 Sansome Street2nd FloorSan Francisco, CA 94104-2711Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheeses and cheese foods; yogurt; jellies and jams; processed nuts; frozen, packaged, or prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, vegetables, pasta, rice or soy; vegetable- and dairy-based dips and spreads; protein-based snack bars; nut-based snack foods and bars; soy-based snack foods and bars; fruit-based snack foods and bars; milk and milk-based beverages; beans and bean-based snack foods and bars; dairy-based beverages; dried fruits and vegetables; dried fruit- and vegetable-based snacks; soups; fermented and pickled vegetables and fruits; dairy-, fruit-, and soy-based frozen confections; nut butters | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee- and tea-based beverages; dry and prepared coffee and tea; confectionary; cereal-, grain-, and granola-based snack foods and bars; packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or grains; bakery goods and breads; pasta and noodles; breakfast cereals; prepared, frozen, or packaged desserts; frozen entrees and appetizers; gluten-free and vegan bread, desserts, and pasta; honey; granola; oatmeal; popcorn; pretzels; cookies; crackers | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beverages, namely, soft drinks, carbonated waters, and non-alcoholic fruit flavored drinks; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of beverages; energy and sports drinks; frozen beverages; coffee-flavored beverages; vegetable juices and smoothies; vegetable-fruit juices and smoothies; fruit juices and smoothies; smoothies containing grains and oats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |