Drawing for DIVE PRIME SEAFOOD

USPTO serial 87056720

DIVE PRIME SEAFOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, REBECCA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVE PRIME SEAFOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl L. Burbach

CHERYL L BURBACH HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN BLVD SUITE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Bar services; Restaurant services; Take-out restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 7, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 7, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 24, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 26, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 2, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 22, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 7, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 25, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2018PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jan 22, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 2, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 14, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance