Drawing for EVERLUB OIL ANALYSIS

USPTO serial 87057444

EVERLUB OIL ANALYSIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERLUB OIL ANALYSIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis K. Ebling

LOUIS K EBLING THOMPSON HINE LLP312 WALNUT STREET SUITE 1400CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software systems for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information related to chemical and physical analyses of fluids and lubricants; laboratory analyzers for measuring, testing and analyzing fluids and lubricantsACTIVE—
042Scientific and industrial research relating to the oil and gas and petrochemical industry; computer programming; oil and gas exploration; product development; analyses of oil and gas fields; geological prospecting, geological and geophysical research; computer security consultancy; computer software design services; scientific laboratory services for research relating to oil and gas industry; pollution control consultancy; computer consultancyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 8, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 26, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 10, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 10, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 11, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 11, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance