USPTO serial 87057606
BIOLOGICS AND BIOSIMILARS COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE CONSORTIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2017
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BIOLOGICS AND BIOSIMILARS COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE CONSORTIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Safran
Joseph W. Berenato, III Calderon Safran & Cole P.C.7918 Jones Branch Drive, Ste. 500McLean, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research services, namely, providing scientific information on the safety and effectiveness of marketed biosimilars and their corresponding novel biologics; scientific information services, namely, providing scientific information about the effectiveness and safety of biosimilars and biologics | ACTIVE | Jun 2, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Other trademarks owned by Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIOLOGICS AND BIOSIMILARS COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE CONSORTIUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 27, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |