USPTO serial 87058359
G.PULLAREDDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G.PULLAREDDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Keener
Kevin Keener Keener and Associates, P.C.161 North Clark StreetSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Indian Sweets, namely, biscuits; Confectionery primarily made of sugar; Frozen confectionery; chocolate; Spices; Snacks, namely, rice-based snack foods and wheat-based snack foods; Nankeens, namely, traditional Indian savories primarily made of wheat, flour, rice, gram flour, Indian spices, chilli powder, salt and fried in edible vegetable oil; Fried foods, namely, traditional Indian savories made of wheat, flour, rice, gram flour, Indian spices, chili powder, salt and fried in edible vegetable oil; Ready to eat foods, namely, prepared and packaged Indian meals, made primarily of rice, wheat, various kinds of flours, spices, condiments | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Marketing services; distributorships, wholesale and retail store services, retail outlets, online retail store services featuring food products, sweets, and snacks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M/s. G.Pullareddy Sweets Hyderabad
- Other trademarks owned by M/s. G.Pullareddy Sweets Hyderabad
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named G.PULLAREDDY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |