USPTO serial 87058784
PARK CITY RECORDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARK CITY RECORDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen E. O'Brien,
KAREN E. O'BRIEN, INVEST PARK CITY, LLC2123 EVENING STAR DRIVEPARK CITY, UT 84060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production of audio recording; Production of films; Production of music; Production of musical sound recording; Production of musical videos; Production of sound and image recordings on sound and image carriers; Production of sound and music video recordings; Production of sound recordings; Production of video and computer game software; Production of video cassettes; Production of video discs and tapes; Audio recording and production; Augmented reality video production; Entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely, musical composition for others and production of musical sound recordings; Entertainment services in the nature of creation, development, and production of television programming; Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production and post-production services of multimedia entertainment content; Entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the field of music; Entertainment services, namely, multimedia production services; Film production; Film production, other than advertising films; Film and video production; Film and video production consulting services; Film and video film production; Film and video tape film production; Media production services, namely, video and film production; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of development, production and post-production services in the fields of video and films; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Multimedia entertainment software production services; Music production services; Music video production; Post-production editing services in the field of music, videos and film; Record production; Record master production; Video production services; Video tape film production; Videotape production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |