USPTO serial 87061372
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Kornfield
SUSAN M. KORNFIELD BODMAN PLC201 S. DIVISION ST., SUITE 400ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and café services, including restaurant carryout services; Catering services; Juice bar services; Bar and cocktail lounge services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |