USPTO serial 87061818
INTRINSIC CORRECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTRINSIC CORRECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Speiss, III
THOMAS J. SPEISS, III STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH, P.C.100 Wilshire Blvd.4th FloorSanta Monica, CA 90401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio and video equipment for transmitting, receiving and playing audio and sound, namely, distribution amplifiers for audio and video signals; Audio and video equipment, namely, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; Digital sound processors; Radio receivers and monitors for reproduction of sound and signals; Audio electronic components, namely, surround sound systems; Audio equipment for producing sound, namely, audio speakers; Audio and video equipment, namely, controlled volume pumps; Audio and video equipment, namely, computer-controlled apparatus for testing and measuring radio frequency signals | ACTIVE | Sep 18, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 15, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |