USPTO serial 87062504
BESTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2018
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with BESTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen Bestek Electric Co., Ltd
Shenzhen, CN
Shenzhen Bestek Electric Co., Ltd
Shenzhen, CN
Shenzhen Bestek Electric Co., Ltd
Shenzhen, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
Joe McKinney Muncy Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Air fragrancing preparations; Cleaning preparations; Cosmetics; Floor wax; Fragrances; Incense [ Laundry detergent; Liquid soap; Polishing preparations; Toothpaste ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 007 | [ Air filters for automobile engines; Automatic vending machines; Cleaning machines for oil and gas industrial machines; Compressed air pumps; ] Electric hand-held drills; [ Electric welding machines; ] Electrically-powered kitchen appliance for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food; Washing machines for clothes | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 011 | Air-conditioning apparatus; Electric hair dryers; Electric lamps; Friction lighters for igniting gas; [ Indoor radiant heating systems; ] Refrigerators; Tap water faucets [; Water purification machines ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; Canes; Handbags; [ Handbags, purses and wallets; Leather; ] Suitcases; Umbrellas[ ; All purpose sport bags ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 021 | [ Bathroom fittings, namely, dispensing units for household purposes for dispensing wrapping materials for sanitary waste such as diapers, nappies, feminine hygiene products and incontinence products; ] Beverage glassware; [ Ceramic sculptures, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; ] Cleaning sponges; Drinking vessels; [ Electrical applicators for applying cosmetics to the skin; Insect traps; ] Thermal insulated containers for food or beverages; Toothbrushes | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 028 | Archery sets; Chess games; [ Christmas tree stands; Fishing lines; ] Fishing poles; [ Fishing stools; Fishing weights; Game apparatus, namely, bases, bats, and balls for playing indoor and outdoor games; Manually-operated exercise equipment; Roller skates; ] Sport balls; [ Sports equipment, namely, lower body alignment apparatus; Sports equipment, namely, Nordic walking poles; Sports field equipment, namely, corner flags; Action figure toys; Bath toys; ] Dog toys;[ Electronic learning toys; ] Infant toys; Musical toys [ ; Pet toys; Sketching toys; Transforming robotic toys ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Bestek Electric Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Bestek Electric Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Bestek Electric Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BESTEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 6, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2017 | ISMR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |