USPTO serial 87063079
BRAINN WAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRAINN WAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Geza C. Ziegler
GEZA C. ZIEGLER ZIEGLER IP LAW GROUP, LLC55 GREENS FARMS ROADWESTPORT, CT 06880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and mobile applications for customisable content management; computer software and mobile applications consisting of algorithms for managing scientific data and organising content into integrated workflows; computer software and mobile applications allowing users to create and execute customisable workflows with high performance computing, integrate data input and output, algorithms, dashboard data, alerts and notifications; computer software and mobile applications allowing users to leverage artificial intelligence features to examine content across the marketplace to identify patterns in data | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Data processing services; On-line data processing services; Information services related to data processing; Collection of data, namely, collection and systematisation of information into computer databases; Data compilation for others, namely, compilation of business directories; data analysis services, namely, analysis of retail data on specific business locations; Provision of information related to data processing services; Business data analysis services; business data analysis, namely, collection and systematisation of business data; Business consultancy services related to data processing; Compilation of statistical data relating to business | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design of computer software for customisable content management and computing platform; consulting and development services in the field of computer software used to manage complex content, namely, scientific data, algorithms, apps; provision of scientific information, advice and consultancy in relation to computer software in the nature of high performance computing, complex content management, data integration, algorithms, and artificial intelligence features to examine content and identify patterns; data mining; development and testing of computer methods, algorithms and software; data analysis services, namely, gas meter data analysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |