Drawing for VIMOC TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 87063372

VIMOC TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIMOC TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Reilly

PAUL J. REILLY BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.2001 ROSS AVENUESUITE 600DALLAS, TX 75201-2980

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software; computer peripherals; computer sensors; computers and utility computing devices, namely, gateways, computer hardware modules, and data processing equipment for gathering and conducting initial data analytics for large volumes of data gathered by internal remote sensors; data utility computing node, namely, gateways, computer hardware modules, and data processing equipment enabling an Internet-of-Things (IoT) platform, analyzing large volumes of data, extracting and organizing information from the compiled data, storing the compiled or extracted data, and transmitting the results of the compiled or extracted data to users; computer hardware and cognitive computer software for smart applications and internet of things, namely, managing a distributed computer network, wireless sensor detection, gathering detection data, processing data, and data analysisACTIVE—
037Computer hardware installation and repair; maintenance and repair of computer networking hardwareACTIVE—
042Installation, maintenance and repair of software for computer systems; computer hardware and software design and development services; computer consulting services; consulting in the field of computer data analytics, computer engineering, computer software engineering; computer consulting and development services in the field of computer software for management, optimization, monitoring, tracking, troubleshooting and investigation of software and computer networks; research and design for new computer software and hardware products; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software and hardware problems; computer project management services; professional computer consultancy services related to implementation, customization, support and maintenance of computer technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 25, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance