USPTO serial 87064109
VIVIA BIOTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVIA BIOTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TRES CANTOS Madrid, ES
TRES CANTOS Madrid, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
THOMAS W. BROOKE HESPOS & PORCO, LLP110 W. 40th St.Suite 2501New York, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and nutraceutical preparations for the treatment of rare haematologic, oncologic, respiratory, immune, cardio-vascular, metabolic, genitourinary, neurologic, central nervous system, depressive, dermatologic, inflammatory and muscle-skeleton diseases, and aging and tissue and organ transplantation diseases; pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of disorders of the nervous system, the immune system, the cardio-vascular system, the metabolic system, the respiratory system, the muscle-skeletal system, the genitourinary system; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of inflammatory disorders; pharmaceutical preparations for use in dermatology, oncology, haematology, in tissue and organ transplantation, in ophthalmology and for the treatment of gastroenterological disorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |