USPTO serial 87064811
M L MULTILIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M L MULTILIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oly Filatova
OLY FILATOVA LAW OFFICES OF OLY FILATOVA601 VAN NESS AVENUE, SUITE 2052SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile telephones; portable media players; smart phones; computer operating system software; computer game software; computer game programs; electronic game programs; interactive video game programs; computer software for providing access to computer games through online social networking websites; computer game software for use on mobile devices, namely, mobile application software for smart phones | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertisement for others on the Internet; Advertisement via mobile phone networks; Advertising and dissemination of advertisement services; Advertising on the Internet for others; Advertising via electronic media and specifically the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of audio, video, and multimedia content by means of cellular communication, wireless communication, the Internet, electronic communications networks, and computer networks; providing multiple user access to computer networks; providing multiple-user access to computer networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; electronic transmission of data, messages, images, and documents via computer networks; providing online transmission of messages among computer users in the field of general interest and for playing games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer and electronic games; Providing online information in the field of computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing computer games on-line and in mobile wireless form | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software development; software implementation; computer hardware design and development and software consulting services; multimedia and audio-visual software consulting services; providing technical troubleshooting support for computer systems, databases and applications; providing consultation services for developing computer systems, databases and applications; information relating to computer technology provided on-line from a global computer network or the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MULTILIFE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MULTILIFE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named M L MULTILIFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |