Drawing for COSA

USPTO serial 87064921

COSA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COSA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Lieberman

LEO M LOUGHLIN ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC607 14TH STREET NW SUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 24, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 24, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 27, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 27, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2016RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Sep 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance