USPTO serial 87068919
UBERCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE RISO, LOKSYE GEORGIANA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UBERCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Passler
MARK D. PASSLER AKERMAN LLPP.O. BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical nursing, healthcare, and hygienic and beauty personal care services; provision of health care services; rehabilitation services, namely, rehabilitation patient care services; nursing and healthcare services; nursing home services; hospital services; information services relating to health care, namely, providing healthcare information; providing healthcare information about medical services, including providing the aforesaid healthcare information over the Internet; respite care services in the nature of home nursing aid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |