USPTO serial 87069058
SEIKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2017
- Examiner
- MIRANDA, JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SEIKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mathew A. Dooley
Mathew A. Dooley Dooley, Gembala, McLaughlin & Pecora CO., LPA5455 Detroit RoadSheffield Village, OH 44054UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metalworking machine tools, namely, vertical machining centers, multi-axis vertical machining centers, compound machining centers, horizontal machining centers, grinding centers, computer numerically controlled (CNC) machine tools, drilling and tapping centers, lathes, computer numerically controlled (CNC) lathes, high speed precision lathes, turning centers, multitasking turning centers, multitasking lathes, and 3-D printers, ultrasonic assisted CNC machine tools, additive manufacturing machines for manufacturing three-dimensional objects in the field of industrial and commercial use | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Absolute Machine Tools, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Absolute Machine Tools, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Absolute Machine Tools, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SEIKI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |