USPTO serial 87069409
NEUTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSENTHAL, AARON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neutec Ar-Ge Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
Esenler, Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by Neutec Ar-Ge Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
NEUTEC ILAC SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ESENLER, ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by NEUTEC ILAC SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
NEUTEC ILAC SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKET
ESENLER, ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by NEUTEC ILAC SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKET
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu
L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu CRAFT CHU PLLC1204 Heights BoulevardHouston, TX 77008-6918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for human use containing a diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceutical for the treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of alimentary tract and metabolic diseases, blood and blood forming organ diseases, cardiovascular system diseases, dermatological diseases, genito-urinary system and sex hormones diseases, systemic hormonal diseases, systemic infectious diseases, neoplastic or immunomodulatory diseases, musculo-skeletal system diseases, nervous system diseases, parasitological diseases, respiratory system diseases, sensory organs diseases, none of the aforesaid goods being disinfectants or sterilisers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing consulting services in the field of regulatory submission management to pharmaceutical companies to assist them with applications for drug delivery device approval; regulatory submission management, namely, assisting pharmaceutical companies in preparing and filing applications for pharmaceutical with governmental regulatory bodies; none of the aforesaid services relating to disinfectants or sterilisers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing services in the field of pharmaceuticals for others; none of the aforesaid services relating to disinfectants or sterilisers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research services for clinical, medical and pharmaceutical purposes; chemical research for medical, clinical and pharmaceutical purposes; consulting services in the field of pharmaceutical research development; quality control services for others; none of the aforesaid services relating to disinfectants or sterilisers | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Regulatory compliance consulting in the field of drug delivery devices and pharmaceuticals; none of the aforesaid services relating to disinfectants or sterilisers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Neutec Ar-Ge Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
- Other trademarks owned by NEUTEC ILAC SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by NEUTEC ILAC SANAYI TICARET ANONIM SIRKET
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named NEUTEC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 30, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |