USPTO serial 87070487
XTUNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XTUNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen TDINTEL Technology Co.,Ltd
NANSHAN DIST,SHENZHEN, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen TDINTEL Technology Co.,Ltd
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Alarm installations and alarms; Data processing apparatus; Downloadable software application for downloading DVR-recorded content for viewing on smartphones; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for use as a spreadsheet, word processing, image editing; Downloadable computer software for use in database management, for use as a spreadsheet, for word processing, image editing; Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable mobile applications for use as a spreadsheet, word processing, image editing; Micro-processors; Microprocessors; Radios; Tablet computers; Theft alarms; Transponders; Anti-theft locks specially adapted to personal electronic devices, namely, laptops, PC tablets; Automatic pill counters; Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Electronic apparatus, namely, motion detectors; Fire and smoke detectors; Geiger counters; Inspection mirrors; Lap-counting devices, namely, counters for use during sporting activities; Magnetic object detectors; Radiation detectors; Seismic detectors | ACTIVE | Jun 16, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |