USPTO serial 87071130
RIG DIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPALE, LISA ANNE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIG DIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisabeth H. Coakley
LISABETH H COAKLEY HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys, unwrought or semi-wrought; transportable buildings of metal; pipes and tubes of metal | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |