USPTO serial 87071587
DU PHOTO WONDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DU PHOTO WONDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting services, namely, transmission of advertising programs and media advertising communications via digital communications networks; Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; Communications by computer terminals; Computer services, namely, providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of general interest; Electronic bulletin board services; Electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network; Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; Electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; Peer-to-peer network computer services, namely, electronic transmission of audio, video and other data and documents among computers; Peer-to-peer photo sharing services, namely, electronic transmission of digital photo files among internet users; Providing access to databases; Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; Transmission of sound, picture and data signals; Voice mail services; Electronic transmission of mail and messages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAIDU ONLINE NETWORK TECHNOLOGY (BEIJING) CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BAIDU ONLINE NETWORK TECHNOLOGY (BEIJING) CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named DU PHOTO WONDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |