USPTO serial 87071851
HL BEARINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FREEMAN, BREANNA SHALEISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HL BEARINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly A. Berger
KIMBERLY A BERGER MILLER CANFIELD PADDOCK & STONE PLC150 W JEFFERSONSUITE 2500DETROIT, MI 48226Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Ball bearings, ball rings for ball bearings and deep groove ball bearings for use in machines, namely, power operated hand tools, parts of motors and engines, agricultural machinery, namely, combines, harvesters and tillers, household appliances, gear boxes, construction machinery, namely, forklifts and cranes, chemical and mining machinery, engines for boats, boat trailers lawn mowers and snow blowers; cylindrical roller bearings for machines, and heavy duty universal joint engine bearings | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1966 |
| 012 | Axle bearings for land vehicles; Parts of motorcycles, namely, fork bearings and races; Wheel bearing kits for use with land vehicles; Wheel bearings for land vehicles | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1966 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |