USPTO serial 87072574
MARBLEROCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARBLEROCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie Edward
VALERIE EDWARD BALLAGH & EDWARD LLP102-175 LONGWOOD ROAD SOUTHHAMILTON, L8P0A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric appliances, namely, beverage warmers, bread making machines, coffee makers, coffee urns, coffee and tea percolators, freezers, refrigerators, convection ovens, casseroles, slow cookers, dehumidifiers, dehydrators, electric fondue pots with heat source, electric frying pans, hotplates, rotisseries, espresso and cappuccino making machines, deep fryers, griddles, grills, hot pots, namely, cooking pots, humidifiers, ice cream makers, food steamers, kettles, microwave ovens, pizza making cooking ovens, popcorn popper, roasters, sandwich makers, food steamers, tea pots, toaster ovens, toasters, waffle makers, woks, yogurt makers and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Non-electric bakeware, non-electric cookware, namely, pots, pans, skillets, woks, roasting pans, Dutch ovens, double boilers, muffin tins, cake pans, pie plates, cookie sheets, bread pans, non-electric cooking graters, casserole dishes, non-electric steamers, cutting boards, and salad spinners; non-electric hand-operated food blenders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |