USPTO serial 87074634
GROW FROM THE INSIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OESTREICHER, SALIMA PARMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GROW FROM THE INSIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Salt Lake, UT
North Salt Lake, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Hardman
Thomas M. Hardman RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER36 South State Street, Suite 1400Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen dessert consisting of vegetable pulp; cooked vegetable-based pulp; milk of almonds for culinary purposes, namely, raw, cold-pressed almond milk; processed acai berries, namely, acai-based entrees; hummus; kale chips; soups; supplements, namely, non-alcoholic fruit extracts for use as ingredients of nutritional supplements and vitamins; turkey sausage; salads, namely, fruit salads, chicken salads, tofu salads, turkey salads, and vegetable salads; burgers, namely, turkey burger patties, lentil burger patties, veggie burger patties, and vegetable burger patties; soups, namely, lentil soup, vegetable soup, and seasonal soup; plant-based beverage used as a milk substitute, namely, almond milk, cashew milk, and nut milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Porridge, namely, oat porridge, quinoa porridge, amaranth porridge, and granola porridge; sandwich wraps; granola; crackers; processed quinoa, namely, quinoa salads; rice salads; processed quinoa, namely, quinoa burgers; wrap sandwiches, namely, chicken wraps, tuna wraps, tofu wraps, whole wheat wraps, and vegetable wraps; toast; toasted bread; chia pudding; vegetable-based crackers | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh culinary herbs; organic fresh herbs; unprocessed herbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices, namely, raw, cold-pressed juices; milk of almonds for beverage, namely, raw, cold-pressed almond milk; ale; lemonade; smoothies; water beverages, namely, filtered water; drinks, namely, coconut water and soda water; vegetable-based, fruit-based, and herb-based flavored water; vegetable-based and plant-based drinks and beverages; fruit and vegetable juices, namely, healthy fruit-based, vegetable-based, herb-based, and plant-based juices for the purpose of juice cleanses; fruit and vegetable juices for juice cleanse programs featuring a balanced variety of nutritious fruit and vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Smoothie and juice bar services; restaurant services, namely, health food restaurant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PLK, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PLK, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named GROW FROM THE INSIDE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |