USPTO serial 87077042
LUCKYOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUCKYOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John G. Tutunjian
JOHN G. TUTUNJIAN TUTUNJIAN & BITETTO, P.C.401 BROADHOLLOW ROADSUITE 402MELVILLE, NY 11747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Household or kitchen utensils, not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, pizza cutters, forks and spoons, and cake knives | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers, not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, wooden cutting boards, wine stoppers, namely, bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles, wine charms, namely, charms for attachment to wine bottles and glasses for identification purposes, spatulas, turners, whisks, corkscrews, cheese graters, baking molds, cookie cutters, chopsticks, serving forks, serving spoons, drinking straws, tea infusers, egg molds, serving tongs, potholders; beverage glassware, porcelain and earthenware items, not included in other classes, namely, drinking glasses, shot glasses, beer pint glasses, wine glasses, decanters, dishes, creamer pitchers, sugar bowls, salt and pepper shakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |