USPTO serial 87079409
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tsz Lung Yeung
333 W. GARVEY AVENUE, #B586MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motorcycles; Bikes; Electric motorcycles; Electric bikes; Automobiles; Electric cars; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake cables, brake calipers, brake pedals, brake rotors, clutch cables, fork bearings and races, fork dust boots, fork seals, front dash panels, front spacers, handle bar control levers, handle bar dampers, handle bar grips, handle bars, headlight mounts, shift levers, handle bar throttles, brake levers, brake master cylinder assemblies, clutch master cylinder assemblies and master cylinders; Electric motors for motor cars; Structural parts for automobiles; Automobile bodies; Automobile bumper guards; Automobile bumpers; Automobile chassis; Automobile door handles; Automobile engines; Automobile gear shifters; Automobile gear sticks; Automobile hoods; Automobile roof racks; Automobile seat cushions; Automobile structural parts for racing purposes, namely, fuel storage cells; Automobile sunroofs; Automobile suspension devices, namely, coilovers; Automobile suspension system components, namely, spring perches; Automobile wheel shields; Brake pads for automobiles; Bumpers for automobiles; Doors for automobiles; Inner tubes; Motors for automobiles; Mudguards; Rearview mirrors for automobiles; Seats for automobiles; Shock absorbers for automobiles; Spokes for automobiles; Steering wheel covers for automobiles; Tires; Wheel rims; Wheels; and Windscreen wipers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |