CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PRO-TO-GO

USPTO serial 87080202

PRO-TO-GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO-TO-GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle T. Peterson

KYLE T PETERSON PATTERSON THUENTE PEDERSEN PA4800 IDS CENTER80 SOUTH 8TH STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005protein dietary supplements sold in individual cartridges for use in single serve coffee brewersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 14, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 22, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 29, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 29, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 28, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 28, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 6, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance