Drawing for MILES REDD

USPTO serial 87080291

MILES REDD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILES REDD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheldon Palmer

Sheldon Palmer Furgang & Adwar, L.L.P.2 Crosfield Avenue, Suite 210West Nyack, NY 10994UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Tableware and flatware, namely, forks, knives, and spoonsACTIVE—
021Dinnerware, namely, plates, bowls, serving platters, serving trays; Beverage glassware, namely, pitchers; Dinnerware; Barware in the nature of beverage glassware; Beverage glasswareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 7, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 31, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 31, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 3, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 3, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance