USPTO serial 87080541
PERFECTLYFREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFECTLYFREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jared M. Barrett
JARED M. BARRETT SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Encapsulated dietary food supplements; all relating to products that are explicitly sold, offered or promoted as being free or substantially free from one or more allergens | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Foodstuffs, namely, frozen yogurts and ice creams individually encapsulated in an edible membrane; all relating to products that are explicitly sold, offered or promoted as being free or substantially free from one or more allergens | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Foodstuffs, namely, edible spheres containing flavored water, fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit extracts, soft drinks; all relating to products that are explicitly sold, offered or promoted as being free or substantially free from one or more allergens | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, spirits and liquors, pre-mixed alcohol beverages, other than beers, and prepared alcoholic cocktails all encapsulated in an edible membrane; all relating to products that are explicitly sold, offered or promoted as being free or substantially free from one or more allergens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INCREDIBLE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INCREDIBLE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WikiFoods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named PERFECTLYFREE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |