Drawing for NESTOR

USPTO serial 87082200

NESTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NESTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yasmine O. Abdel-Aal

YASMINE O. ABDEL-AAL MARKAH LEGAL PC260 NEWPORT CENTER DR., STE. 100NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, downloadable computer software, mobile application software, and computer application software for mobile phones, computers for use in connecting consumers of professional services with professional service providers, and for use in providing consumer recommendations, ratings and reviews by consumers about professional service providersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 31, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 31, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 2, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 8, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 8, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance