USPTO serial 87083763
POLLOCK TECHNIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLLOCK TECHNIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
POLLOCK SURGICAL CLINICS, INC.
NEW WESTMINSTER, CA
Gentle Procedures Franchising LP
Denver, CO
Gentle Procedures Franchising LP
Denver, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene M. Krogh
Charlene M. Krogh Dorsey & Whitney LLP1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 400IP DocketingDenver, CO 80202-5549Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting services for physicians in the field of management and operation of a medical clinic and practice providing vasectomies and male circumcision, namely, business management, human resources management, business development; marketing and advertising consulting, namely, consulting with physicians on how to market and advertise a medical clinic and practice providing vasectomies and male circumcision, client management, medical billing management, medical records management, insurance management, selection and procurement of medical office premises | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and training services for physicians in the field of medical services, namely, education and training about performance of vasectomies, no-scalpel vasectomies, male circumcision, male no-scalpel circumcision and related patient pre-operative and post-operative counseling; education and training services in the field of management and operation of a medical clinic and practice providing vasectomies and male circumcision, namely, business management, financial management, human resources management, business development | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Operation of a medical clinic and practice providing vasectomies and male circumcision; medical services, namely, performing vasectomies, no-scalpel vasectomies, male circumcision, male no-scalpel circumcision, and pre-operative and post-operative counseling and consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POLLOCK SURGICAL CLINICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Gentle Procedures Franchising LP
- Other trademarks owned by Gentle Procedures Franchising LP
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named POLLOCK TECHNIQUE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 2, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |