USPTO serial 87084620
ROBODEV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5568002Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2018
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROBODEV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SARAJEVO, BA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Karlsruhe, DE
Karlsruhe, DE
Karlsruhe, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morris E. Turek
MORRIS E. TUREK YOURTRADEMARKATTORNEY.COM167 LAMP AND LANTERN VILLAGE#220CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017-8208Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots; Service robots for manufacturing, namely, machines for picking, transporting, and unloading of materials; Collaborative industrial robots for interaction with humans in a shared production workspace; Machines and machine tools for treatment of materials and for manufacturing, namely, milling machines and drilling machines for the treatment of wood, plastics, metals, and ceramics; Machines for the assembly of parts, namely, machines for joining parts by means of a mechanical connection, such as screws, nails, tight fits, crimp connections, solder connections, and welded joints; Replacement parts for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Recorded content, namely, recorded computer operating programs, recorded software application programs for use in factory automation, namely, software to define factory automation processes and integrate manufacturing machines; Recorded embedded software programs for use in factory automation, namely, software to define factory automation processes and integrate manufacturing machines; Operating manuals for computer software systems sold as unit with the software: Computer software for use in setting up, programing, and maintaining machines and automation equipment; Computer-aided design (CAD) software and computer-aided engineering (CAE) software for use in programing factory automation processes, physics simulation, data visualization, data analytics, image processing, industrial cameras, and embedded devices, namely, microcontrollers and microprocessors; Computer hardware; Cables for electricity, namely, electric cables, electric communication cables, hybrid cables, namely, cables that transmit electric energy and digital communication signals; Replacement parts for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation, cleaning, repair, and maintenance of industrial robots, industrial automation systems comprised of manufacturing machines, namely, milling machines and drilling machines for the treatment of wood, plastics, metals, and ceramics, and computer hardware; Rental of industrial automation systems comprised of manufacturing machines, namely, milling machines and drilling machines for the treatment of wood, plastics, metals, and ceramics, and computer hardware; Rental of replacement parts for all the aforesaid goods; Consultancy and information in relation to the aforesaid services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | IT consulting services; Software development: Computer programming; Implementation of software; Computer hardware development; Rental of industrial robots; Rental of computer software; Rental of computer hardware; Research and development of computer software; Data mining; Technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware systems; Scientific research; Product testing; Quality control for others; Consultancy in relation to the aforesaid services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOVIC, EDVIN
- Other trademarks owned by POVIO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBODEV GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ROBODEV GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ROBODEV GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROBODEV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |