CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SUPERAQUA

USPTO serial 87084664

SUPERAQUA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5308539Status 701Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2017
Examiner
JACKSON, SHA-KARA ELOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 701: Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary.

Need help with SUPERAQUA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph A. Bruce

Joseph A. Bruce Bruce Stone LLP8888 Keystone Crossing, Suite 1300Indianapolis, IN 46240UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water purifier, water purification equipment, namely, filter cartridges, filter heads and filter housings; Ionized water dispenser, namely, electrolysis ionized water dispenser; Ionized water generator, namely, household electrolysis ionized water generator, industrial alkaline ionized water generator; Water ionizerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2023NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 20238.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Aug 8, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 20238.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Mar 2, 20238.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Mar 2, 2023ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 10, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 5, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2017CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance