Drawing for CELEBRITY

USPTO serial 87084771

CELEBRITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RYDLAND, STEPHANIE DIANA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CELEBRITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph E. Sutton

JOSEPH E. SUTTON LAW OFFICES, EZRA SUTTON, P.A.900 U.S. HIGHWAY 9SUITE 201WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Mattress toppers; Pillows; Throw pillows; Decorative 3D pillows and cushions; Throw pillowsACTIVE—
024Bed sheets; Blanket throws; Comforters; Mattress pads; Pillow cases; Bed blankets; Blanket throwsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 10, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 20, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance