USPTO serial 87086691
CIMOLAI TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2017
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CIMOLAI TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carmignano di Brenta (Padova), IT
Carmignano di Brenta (Padova), IT
Carmignano di Brenta (Padova), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria A. Savio
Maria A. Savio GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.270 MADISON AVE, 8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Cranes; [ (Based on 44(e)) Construction equipment, namely, concrete construction machines, bulldozers, tractors, skid-steer loaders, loading machines, ] launching gantries [, and earth moving machines, namely, backhoes, excavators, graders, and scrapers; Elevating or lifting work platforms ] ; Lifting apparatus, namely, gantry cranes and ship lifts; Crane hooks; [ Building hoists; ] Mechanical and hydraulic lifts [ ; Elevating or lifting mobile work platforms; Lifting work platforms; Elevating work platforms; Mobile elevating work platforms; Aerial work platforms for use with cranes; Mobile aerial work platforms; derricks; shredders for industrial and compost waste; Rubbish compactors ] | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2009 |
| 012 | (Based on 44(e)) Trolleys; General purpose trolleys; Transport carriages, namely, remotely controlled land vehicles for transport [ ; Railway bogies; Fork lift trucks; Electric fork lift trucks; Platform trucks; Trucks featuring bed-mounted material handling machinery primarily for use in the construction materials delivery industry, namely, hydraulic extendable material conveyors, mechanical extendable material conveyors, and truck bed material lifting platforms; Dollies; Forks for fork lift trucks; Fork lift trucks and structural parts therefor; Vehicles for the tipping of loads, namely, dump trucks; Davits for boats ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) Testing of cranes; Computer software design; Software development; Design of engineered building infrastructure systems; [ design of industrial plants; Design of boats; ] Engineering design; Industrial design; Engineering drawing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CIMOLAI TECHNOLOGY S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CIMOLAI TECHNOLOGY S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CIMOLAI TECHNOLOGY S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CIMOLAI TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |