USPTO serial 87086744
LIVENCLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODWIN, KATRINA JOYE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIVENCLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TAOYUAN CITY, TW
TAOYUAN CITY, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Winston
LAURA J. WINSTON KIM WINSTON LLP73 MARKET STREET, SUITE 376YONKERS, NY 10710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Massage apparatus; Skin scraping board for therapeutic purposes being an apparatus for gua sha scraping therapy; Massage apparatus and instruments; Massage instruments, namely, hand and finger vibrators; Foot massage apparatus; Massage apparatus, namely, massage sticks; Physical exercise apparatus for physical therapy or medical purposes, namely, an electrical apparatus with massaging nodules for increasing blood flow and circulation; Electric massage apparatus for household use; Vibromassage apparatus; Feeding bottle; Feeding bottle teats; Breast pumps; Spa machine for therapeutic purposes, namely, an apparatus for reducing pain, improving blood transportation or blood regeneration due to the therapeutic effects; Electric foot spa massagers | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea; Coffee beans; Coffee-based beverages; Seasonings; Sugar; Honey; Cereal-based snack food; Dessert puddings; Wheat flour; Yeast; Noodles; Dumplings; Pre-packaged lunches consisting primarily of rice, and also including meat, fish or vegetables; Cooked rice mixed with vegetables and beef, namely, bibimbap; Instant noodles; Noodles and seasoning mixes combined in unitary packages; Oatmeal; Pies; Candies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |