USPTO serial 87087040
INTEGRATIVE SKIN THERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5460880Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2018
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRATIVE SKIN THERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl A. Withycombe
Cheryl A. Withycombe AbbVie2525 DUPONT DRIVEAND-250CIRVINE, CA 92612-1531Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated acne treatment preparations; Non-medicated skincare preparations; Skin cleansers; Skin toners; Facial skin lotions; Skin moisturizers; Anti-aging moisturizers; Skin creams; Anti-aging creams; Eye creams; Anti-wrinkle creams; Sunblock preparations and creams; Sunscreen preparations and creams; Pre-Moistened cosmetic wipes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2016 |
| 005 | Acne treatment preparations; Medicated skin care preparations; Medicated pre-moistened wipes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2016 |
| 010 | Cosmetic apparatus, namely, an electronic skin treatment device in the nature of a skin-resurfacing treatment device that combines exfoliation, extraction, and infusion of condition-specific serums to improve skin health, function and appearance; Dermatological instruments, namely, instruments in the nature of microdermabrasion apparatus that perform laser dermabrasion of the skin; Disposable heads specially adapted for microdermabrasion devices in the nature of microdermabrasion apparatus; Microdermabrasion apparatus; Apparatus for acne treatment; Disposable heads, namely, treatment tips specially adapted for microdermabrasion apparatus in the nature of diamond and disposable treatment tips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2016 |
| 021 | Cosmetic apparatus, namely, an electronic skin treatment device in the nature of a power operated handpiece in the nature of a brush and applicator used to exfoliate skin | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Envy Medical, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Envy Medical, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named INTEGRATIVE SKIN THERAPY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 1, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |