USPTO serial 87087056
CAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
NICHOLAS D. WELLS LEGENDS LAW GROUP, PLLC330 N. MAIN ST.KAYSVILLE, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Metal upholstery tacks, Metal upholstery tacks having a glass or plastic decorative top; metal brads; cut nails; metal screws; Metal staples for construction or industrial use; Metal pegs; metal studs and buttons, both uncovered and covered with textiles, glass, or plastic, used in constructing or upholstering furniture; metal studs in the nature of metal rivets; metal buttons in the nature of metal fastening hardware; flexible metal brackets used to position or bind upholstered textiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | (Based on Intent to Use) Power staplers; powered sewing machinery; stitching machines, sewing machines, riveting machines; punching machines, namely, power presses; metal working machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | (Based on Intent to Use) Hand-powered staple guns; upholstery staple removers; hammers; hand-operated presses for cutting textiles; hand-operated presses for affixing textile, glass, or plastic pieces to buttons or studs used as part of furniture or upholstered goods; hand-operated sewing machinery, namely, sewing scissors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAG KABARA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by CAG KABARA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named CAG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |