Drawing for WONDER

USPTO serial 87087202

WONDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WONDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meredith Frank Mendez, Esq.

Meredith Frank Mendez, Esq. Malloy & Malloy, P.L.2800 S.W. 3rd AvenueMiami, FL 33129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Handheld mobile digital electronic devices for the sending and receiving of telephone calls, electronic mail, and other digital data, for use as a digital format audio player, and for use as a handheld computer, personal digital assistant, electronic organizer, electronic notepad, and camera; Computer gaming machines, videophones, prerecorded computer programs for personal information management, database management software, electronic mail and messaging software, database synchronization software, computer programs for accessing, browsing and searching online databases, computer software and firmware, namely, operating system programs, data synchronization programs, and application development computer software programs for personal and handheld computers; software for the redirection of messages, Internet e-mail, and/or other data to one or more electronic handheld services from a data store on or associated with personal computer or a server; software for the synchronization of data between a remote station or device and a fixed or remote station or deviceACTIVE—
028Computer gaming machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 19, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 14, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 9, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance