USPTO serial 87087234
ROBOTSTA COFFEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRANDA, JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROBOTSTA COFFEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TAIPEI CITY, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony King
ANTHONY KING WPAT, P.C.2301 DUPONT DR., SUITE 510IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric coffee makers; Electric apparatus for making coffee; Coffee percolators, electric; Coffee machines, electric; Coffee filters not of paper being part of electric coffee makers; Electric yogurt makers; Electrical ice cream makers; Smoothie maker; Beverage cooling apparatus; Refrigerated dispensing units for beverages; Electric cooking ovens; Electric cookware, namely, roasters; Electric food dehydrators | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea; Tea bag; Tea-based beverages; Coffee; Unroasted coffee; Coffee Beans; Instant coffee; Coffee-based beverages; Ices; Biscuits; Pastries; Confectionery; Cream puffs; Pancakes; Macaroons; Bread; Chocolate mousses; Custard; Dessert pudding; Panna cotta | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Coffee roasting and processing; Food and drink preservation; Food smoking; Fruit crushing; Millworking; Food ingredient treatment; Freezing of foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Shops for providing hot and cold beverages in the nature of a restaurant; Providing of food and drink; Coffee shops; café; Self-service restaurants; Food and drink catering; Catering services; Snack bar; Preparation of food and beverage; Mobile café services for providing food and drink; Mobile restaurant services; Providing of food and drink via a mobile truck; Tea bars; Restaurants; Canteen services; Ice cream parlors; Food sculpting; Rental of small kitchen appliances; Rental of chairs, table, table linen, glassware; Rental of cooking apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Huang, Chin-Che
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ROBOTSTA COFFEE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |