USPTO serial 87087997
G·TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEN, ELIZABETH S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G·TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas B. Kern
Thomas B. Kern BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP41 SOUTH HIGH STREETSUITE 2600COLUMBUS, OH 43215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Greases for medical purposes; Medical diagnostic test strips for measuring glucose levels in blood and urine; blood glucose test control solution for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scales for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Abdominal belts; Acupuncture needles; Needles for medical purposes; Heating cushions, electric, for medical purposes; Abdominal pads; Air cushions for medical purposes; Apparatus for use in medical analysis, namely, digital blood pressure monitors, blood glucose meters, test strips for measuring blood glucose levels, nebulizers for respiration therapy, fetal pulse monitors, digital thermometers for medical purposes, infrared digital thermometers for medical purposes, ambulatory blood pressure monitors, aneroid blood pressure monitors, pulse oximeter, lancets for lancing device, diabetic diagnostic medical lancing device, medical devices for use in cannulation or to stem the flow of traumatic bleeding in the nature of tourniquets, medical devices in the nature of electronic pulse stimulators for muscle stimulation; blood testing apparatus; anesthetic delivery apparatus; Physiotherapy apparatus, namely, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators, neuromuscular stimulator for pain relief in physical therapy purposes; Radiological apparatus for medical purposes; Artificial teeth; Basins for medical purposes; Knives for surgical purposes; Water bags for medical purposes, namely, intravenous bags sold empty for intravenous therapy; Breast pumps; Dental burs; Cannulae; Catgut for surgical use; Catheters; Corsets for medical purposes; Droppers for administering medication for medical purposes, sold empty; Finger guards for medical purposes; Drainage tubes for medical purposes; Electrocardiographs; Positioning pads for preventing pressure sores on patient bodies for medical purposes; Pulse meters; Sphygmomanometers; Stethoscopes; Thread, surgical; Gastroscopes; Hypodermic syringes; Inhalers; Surgical knives, namely, fleams; Lasers for medical purposes; Gloves for massage; Heart pacemakers; Massage apparatus; Heart rate frequency monitors; Ophthalmometers; Ophthalmoscopes; Hearing protectors without the ability to reproduce or transmit sound; Pulse meters, digital and analog; Artificial limbs; X-ray photographs for medical purposes; X-ray apparatus for medical purposes; Syringes for medical purposes and for injections; Syringes for medical purposes; Thermometers, for medical purposes; Scissors for surgery; Heart rate monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCUMED PRODUTOS MÉDICO HOSPITALARES LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by ACCUMED PRODUTOS MÉDICO HOSPITALARES LTDA
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named G·TECH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |