Drawing for T TOYOTECH

USPTO serial 87088145

T TOYOTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T TOYOTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery

JAMES M. SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPP.O. BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, medical devices and apparatus for digital radiography; digital photograph viewers for mammography; surgical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; digital flat panel detectors for medical use; medical devices and apparatus for image acquisition; electronic display boards for medical useACTIVE—
042Computer software design, computer programming, and maintenance of computer software; Technological advice relating to computers, automobiles and industrial machines; Rental of measuring apparatus; Rental of computers; Providing on-line non-downloadable computer software programs for software configuration management, tracking system, analyzing computer software, testing computer software, life cycle management, management of security risk, analyzing software vulnerability, computer software development, measuring electromagnetic compatibility, hydrographic survey, 4D simulation, processing digital images or X-ray Images, analysis of data collected for measurement purposes; Rental of laboratory apparatus and instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 3, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 3, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance