USPTO serial 87088534
NU XIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2018
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with NU XIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
North Ryde, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
North Ryde, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
North Ryde, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ZACHARY T. GORDON
ZACHARY T. GORDON Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Electronic gaming machines, namely, devices which accept a wager | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named NU XIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 9, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 9, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |