USPTO serial 87089182
MIRACLE FLAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRACLE FLAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
REDWOOD CITY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY J. PITZER
GARY J PITZER TAROLLI SUNDHEIM COVELL & TUMMINO LLP1300 EAST 9TH STREET SUITE 1700CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Flameless battery powered candles; Electric light strings of flameless candles for Christmas trees | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 25, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |