USPTO serial 87089557
UMORO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UMORO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren Hall
WARREN HALL DENNISON ASSOCIATES301-133 RICHMOND ST. WTORONTO, ONTARIO, M5H2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | sports bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | blender bottles, sold empty; shaker bottles, sold empty; supplement bottles, sold empty; two-part mixing bottles, sold empty; drinking bottles for sports; plastic bottles, sold empty; water bottles, sold empty | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 2014 |
| 025 | athletic clothing, namely, sweatpants and sweatshirts; baseball caps and hats; casual clothing, namely, shirts, pants and sweaters; cloth hats; hats; knit hats; sport shirts; sports clothing; sports jackets; sportswear, namely, sport pants; sports gloves, namely, exercise gloves | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 2016 |
| 041 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of cooking, health, and fitness | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |