USPTO serial 87089699
AMAZING PAPER GRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2017
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AMAZING PAPER GRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winston Salem, NC
Panama City, FL
Panama City, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle Brent-Bownes
Danielle Brent-Bownes Brent Bownes Law PLLC301 N Main St. Suite 2500Winston Salem, NC 27101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Dies for use with hand operated tools; Hand tools, namely, dies; Punching dies | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2013 |
| 016 | Paper; [ Paper cake decorations; ] Paper cutters; [ Paper decorative garlands for parties; ] Paper die cut shapes; Paper gift cards; Paper ribbons; [ Stamp pad inks; Stamp pads; Stamping inks; Art paper; Arts and craft paint kits; Children's arts and crafts paper kits; Decorative paper centerpieces; Gift wrapping paper; Ink stamps; ] Packaged kits comprising printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials for educational activities in the field of art and papercraft; Paper embossers; Rubber stamps | ACTIVE | Feb 14, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rebecca Feeken
- Other trademarks owned by Rebecca Feeken
- Other trademarks owned by Rebecca Feekin
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named AMAZING PAPER GRACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 22, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 16, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |