Drawing for BEARLY THERE

USPTO serial 87089997

BEARLY THERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEARLY THERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Alaniz

RICHARD ALANIZ LOWE GRAHAM JONES PLLC701 FIFTH AVESUITE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear; Footwear for men; Footwear for women; Footwear; Hats; Infants' shoes and boots; Jackets and socks; Leather shoes; Leg-warmers; Sandals and beach shoes; Snow boots; StockingsACTIVE—
045Online social networking services in the field of fashion provided via a websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 25, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 15, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 15, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 15, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 15, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 15, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance