Drawing for VECTO

USPTO serial 87090342

VECTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VECTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason P. Eves

JASON P. EVES PHILLIPS RYTHER & WINCHESTER124 SOUTH 600 EASTSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data collection systems for use with bicycles, namely, computer software and hardware that collect, upload and sync data regarding alternative routes of urban travel to an Internet website via mobile communications devices, applications and platformsACTIVE—
035Retail store services and on-line store services in the field of urban mobility products, namely, road condition and traffic information data collection system devices for use with bicyclesACTIVE—
042Online data collection services for calibration and coordinate-measurement purposes for calculating urban travel route planning and access to urban travel route alternatives; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for collecting, tracking, analyzing, and distributing data and information regarding urban and mobile activities, namely, providing road condition and traffic information related to urban mobility and multimodal travelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 19, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance