USPTO serial 87093510
WORLD'S BEST VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORLD'S BEST VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Quirk
WILLIAM H QUIRK ROSENTHAL PAUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI AGATHER LLP755 E MULBERRY SUITE 200SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network featuring the uploaded, posted, shown, displayed, and tagged videos of others; electronically transmitting information, audio, and video clips | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests and sweepstakes by broadcasting audio and video clips over the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a web site that gives computer users the ability to upload and share user-generated videos, on a wide variety of topics and subject | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WGVS USA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by J. Allen Investments, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WORLD'S BEST VIDEO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |