CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MASTERWORK MANUFACTURING

USPTO serial 87095170

MASTERWORK MANUFACTURING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADEMI, XHENETA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERWORK MANUFACTURING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine J. Banti

CATHERINE J. BANTI ANDERSON ZEIGLERP.O. BOX 1498SANTA ROSA, CA 95402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Contract manufacturing services for others, namely, custom fabrication and assembly of circuit boards, cable harnesses, printed circuit board turnkey assemblies, and other industrial products in the nature of consumer electronics and their structural parts and componentsACTIVE—
042Contract custom design of circuit boards, cable harnesses, printed circuit board turnkey assemblies, and other industrial products in the nature of consumer electronics and their structural parts and componentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 25, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 25, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance